samedi 31 octobre 2020

Leeslijst november 2020

 

  1. Andrés Neuman, El viajero del siglo
  2. Erich Maria Remarque, Im Westen nichts neues 
  3. Max Gallo, Mathilde
  4. Max Gallo, Sarah
  5. Karine Giebel, Chambres noirs
  6. Stephen King, L'Institut
  7. James S. A. Corey, Les cendres de Babylone (6)
  8. James S. A. CoreyLe soulèvement de Persépolis (7)
  9. Barack Obama, A promised land
  10. Salman Rushdie, Quichot
  11. Salman Rushdie, Schaamte
  12. Isabel AllendeEl juego de Ripper
  13. Juan MarséRabos de lagartija 
  14. Jean d'Aillon, Nostradamus et le dragon de Raphaël
  15. Salman Rushdie, Middernachtskinderen
  16. Nicci French, Thursday's child
  17. Heinrich Böll, Die verlorene Ehre der Katharina Blum
  18. Patrick SüskindDas Parfum
  19. Andreas Gruber, Todesmal

Gelezen in oktober 2020

  1. Joël Dicker, La disparition de Stephanie Mailer
  2. Jaron LanierTien argumenten om je sociale media-accounts nu meteen te verwijderen
  3. Cathy O'Neil, Weapons of Math Destruction
  4. Camilla Lackberg, The Gilded Cage
  5. Pauline Delabriy-Allard, Ça raconte Sarah
  6. Christoph Keller, Der Boden unter den Füßen
  7. Hermann Hesse [Nobel 1946], Der Steppenwolf
  8. Herta Müller [Nobel 2009], En tierras bajas
  9. Fred VargasL' homme aux cercles bleus
  10. M. Tournier, Le coq de bruyère
  11. Max Gallo, Mariella
  12. Ken Follett, World without end (Kingsbridge 2)
  13. Ken Follett, a column of fire (Kingsbridge 3)
  14. Stephen King, If it bleeds
  15. Willem Frederik Hermans, Au pair
  16. Xiaolong Qiu, Chine, retiens ton souffle

vendredi 23 octobre 2020

Leesstatistieken 2020 tot 23 oktober

Overzicht van (84) gelezen boeken in 2020 tot 23 oktober :

Nederlands (10)

Duits (11)

Engels (14)

Frans (21)

Spaans (26)

Latijn (2)

jeudi 1 octobre 2020

Cathy O'Neil, Weapons of Math Destruction

 

Een interessant boek over de werking van geautomatiseerde modellen en databases die ondanks de soms goede bedoelingen (grotere objectiviteit) en vaak dankzij de minder goede bedoelingen van kille kostenbesparingen automatisch leiden tot zeer ongewenste uitkomsten, vooral voor financieel zwakkeren in de maatschappij. De tekst is goed leesbaar en de gegeven voorbeelden zijn duidelijk en zeer illustratief.

"A model takes what we know and uses it to predict responses in various situations.

Models are opinions embedded in mathematics.

A signature quality of "Weapons of Math Destruction": when the model itself contributes to a toxic cycle and helps to sustain it [=> e.g. diverting police resources to a particular neighbourhood and due to that increased police presence automatically finding more instances of criminality which then seems to justify the inital diversion and results in even a larger diversion of police forces to the same area which results in higher crime figures, etc..].

Three elements of WMD: opacity, scale and damage.

Although some people benefit (when using supposedly impartial models rather than opiniated humans in selection or awarding processes), too many suffer from the consequences of using WMD's. 

Big data processes codify the past and they do not invent the future. Human decison making can evolve; learning from mistakes and adapt. Automated systems do not, and changes depend on when they are reengineered. "



Jaron Lanier, Tien argumenten om je sociale media-accounts nu meteen te verwijderen

  

Een erg interessant boek!

BUMMER "Behavior of Users Modified, and Made into an Empire for Rent"

“is a machine, a statistical machine that lives in the computing clouds….Even at their best, BUMMER algorithms can only calculate the chances that a person will act in a particular way. But what might be only a chance for each person approaches being a certainty on the average for large numbers of people. The overall population can be affected with greater predictability than can any single person. Since BUMMER’s influence is statistical, the menace is a little like climate change. You can’t say climate change is responsible for a particular storm, flood, or drought, but you can say it changes the odds they’ll happen.”

 The ten arguments in a nutshell:

1. You are losing your free will. If you don’t quit, "you are not creating the space in which Silicon Valley can act to improve itself".
2. Quitting social media is the most finely targeted way to resist the insanity of our times. It’s more efficient at harming society than at improving it. Simply quitting can change the world.
3. Social media is making you into an asshole. Lanier says Donald Trump is a victim of his own addiction to twitter (37,400 tweets). For the most powerful politician in the world, his behavior is no better than a teenaged troll. He is not alone.
4. Social media is undermining truth. 
5. Social media is making what you say meaningless.
6. Social media is destroying your capacity for empathy.
7. Social media is making you unhappy.
8. Social media doesn’t want you to have economic dignity. This is the most jarring argument. Lanier says the free model everyone pushed for in the 80s and 90s gave rise to the ad model, and with it the ability to create uncountable millions of fake humans and their corresponding spam and troll activity.
9. Social media is making politics impossible. “There are so few independent news sites, and they’re precious ... Our huge nation is only a few organizations away from having no independent newsrooms with resources and clout.“
10. Social media hates your soul.